Summary
When a batch image mutation's response is lost to a transport-shaped failure (timeout, network drop, parsing error, 5xx), the client cannot know which names committed. Since #9394 it reports those names as failed while invalidating their caches as if the chunk had landed, so RTK-cached views reconcile on refetch — but persisted workspace references do not: handleDeletions strips deleted images out of canvas layers, nodes, and reference images only off a deleted_images payload, and a lost response has none. Effect: a delete that committed server-side can leave persisted slices pointing at gone images until the user notices 404s.
Why the client cannot reconcile this alone
The obvious client-side move — probe the failing chunk's names via POST /api/v1/images/images_by_names and treat absent names as confirmed-deleted — is unsafe with that route's current semantics: it answers per-name authorization failures and per-name storage errors with a silent skip (invokeai/app/api/routers/images.py, get_images_by_names). A locked database therefore returns 200 [], which would "confirm" every probed name as deleted and mass-prune workspace references for images that all still exist. Absence from that response is not evidence of deletion.
Proposed fix (server-side)
Either of:
- Tri-state existence reconciliation: a route taking
image_names and answering per name existing / gone / undecided, where gone is asserted only on a positive ImageRecordNotFoundException read, storage errors answer undecided, and names the caller may not read answer undecided (no information leak). The client then moves gone names into deleted_images (running the normal deletion cleanup), keeps existing names failed (retry works), and leaves undecided names failed without cleanup. A fully unavailable database yields all-undecided and prunes nothing.
- Per-operation ids on the batch mutations plus an outcome endpoint, as suggested in review — heavier, but also covers non-delete mutations and retry dedup.
Context
Raised by @JPPhoto in review of #9394 (round of 2026-08-23: "Lost mutation responses leave stale local references... Recovery: add mutation ids and server-side outcome reconciliation"). #9394 ships the cache-invalidation half; this issue tracks the workspace-reference half, which needs a server-side source of truth. Related: #9531 (bulk-download replay after re-auth).
Summary
When a batch image mutation's response is lost to a transport-shaped failure (timeout, network drop, parsing error, 5xx), the client cannot know which names committed. Since #9394 it reports those names as failed while invalidating their caches as if the chunk had landed, so RTK-cached views reconcile on refetch — but persisted workspace references do not:
handleDeletionsstrips deleted images out of canvas layers, nodes, and reference images only off adeleted_imagespayload, and a lost response has none. Effect: a delete that committed server-side can leave persisted slices pointing at gone images until the user notices 404s.Why the client cannot reconcile this alone
The obvious client-side move — probe the failing chunk's names via
POST /api/v1/images/images_by_namesand treat absent names as confirmed-deleted — is unsafe with that route's current semantics: it answers per-name authorization failures and per-name storage errors with a silent skip (invokeai/app/api/routers/images.py,get_images_by_names). A locked database therefore returns200 [], which would "confirm" every probed name as deleted and mass-prune workspace references for images that all still exist. Absence from that response is not evidence of deletion.Proposed fix (server-side)
Either of:
image_namesand answering per nameexisting/gone/undecided, wheregoneis asserted only on a positiveImageRecordNotFoundExceptionread, storage errors answerundecided, and names the caller may not read answerundecided(no information leak). The client then movesgonenames intodeleted_images(running the normal deletion cleanup), keepsexistingnames failed (retry works), and leavesundecidednames failed without cleanup. A fully unavailable database yields all-undecidedand prunes nothing.Context
Raised by @JPPhoto in review of #9394 (round of 2026-08-23: "Lost mutation responses leave stale local references... Recovery: add mutation ids and server-side outcome reconciliation"). #9394 ships the cache-invalidation half; this issue tracks the workspace-reference half, which needs a server-side source of truth. Related: #9531 (bulk-download replay after re-auth).