Skip to content

chore(deps): update otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib docker tag to v0.161.0 - #614

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
deps/otel-opentelemetry-collector-contrib-0.x
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
deps/otel-opentelemetry-collector-contrib-0.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib minor 0.157.0 → 0.161.0

Release Notes

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases (otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib)

v0.161.0

Compare Source

🛑 Breaking changes 🛑
💡 Enhancements 💡
  • otelcol-contrib: Upgrade go.opentelemetry.io/obi to v0.13.0 (#​1643)

v0.160.0

Compare Source

🚀 New components 🚀
  • spanpruningprocessor: Added missing spanpruningprocessor to otelcol-contrib (#​1608)
💡 Enhancements 💡
  • otelcol-contrib: Upgrade go.opentelemetry.io/obi to v0.11.0. (#​1604)

v0.159.0

Compare Source

🛑 Breaking changes 🛑
  • contrib: Remove deprecated kafkatopicsobserver extension from the contrib distribution (#​1597)
🚀 New components 🚀
  • extension/aws_iam_db_auth: Add aws_iam_db_auth to the contrib distribution (#​1591)

v0.158.0

Compare Source

🛑 Breaking changes 🛑
  • all: Update Cosign usage to work with v3 (#​1570)
    The Cosign v3 upgrade introduced a change in signing workflow. Previous two files
    were required to map the outputs (certificate and signature), now only one file is required.
    The new file is a bundle that contains both outputs in JSON format.
    This change has been done following the guidance from https://goreleaser.com/blog/cosign-v3/.
    With this change, anyone who wants to verify the signature of the artifacts produced by the
    release will need to use Cosign V3 and point to the new bundle file or download the bundle and
    unpack it to get the certificate and signature files.

  • all: Use split checksum for all binaries and distros (#​1582)
    The previous attempt at splitting the checksum file for AIX releases was not successful.
    The problem lies on the fac that .runtime.GOOS will always be the runtime of the compiled
    goreleaser binary ("linux" in this case). The only way to split the checksum file per target
    is what's implement here, but it ends up giving one checksum file per produced artifact.

🚀 New components 🚀
  • icmpcheckreceiver: Add icmpcheckreceiver to the contrib distribution (#​1577)
💡 Enhancements 💡
  • all: Add new binaries for aix/ppc64 (#​1424)
🧰 Bug fixes 🧰
  • all: Skip Docker build and publish in AIX release job. (#​1580)
    The release for Contrib on AIX runs in its own job, where it doesn't build
    Docker images. The continue --merge phase of goreleaser runs all publishers
    by default, including the Docker manifests one. This will fail for AIX as
    the images aren't built.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added the 🗡️ dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Sep 19, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot requested a review from wax911 September 19, 2026 19:18
@anitrend

anitrend Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode Dependabot Risk Review

Schema: local-stack.dependabot-risk.v1

Decision: NEUTRAL
Risk: UNKNOWN
Automerge allowed: false
Update type: unknown
Ecosystem: unknown

Summary

OpenCode did not produce a valid risk classification. Manual review required. Reason: No valid JSON object in OpenCode output.

Changed runtime artifacts

No runtime image changes detected.

Runtime impact

Unknown.

Breaking change assessment

Not assessed because the OpenCode output was missing or invalid.

Required checks

Manual follow-up

  • Review the dependency PR manually.
  • Inspect the workflow logs for OpenCode output or parsing failure.

Sources checked

  • PR diff
  • PR metadata

@anitrend

anitrend Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode risk gate: neutral. Manual review required. Risk: unknown. Reason: OpenCode did not produce a valid risk classification. Manual review required. Reason: No valid JSON object in OpenCode output.

@renovate

renovate Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🗡️ dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants