Repository navigation
Prove a four-cut common dyadic reader obstruction (no κ) - #6226
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 30, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scoped proof with finite corroboration: a common dyadic reader can fail across four reversible cuts even though every proper subfamily admits one. No new kappa is claimed.
For D = Z[1/2], use source-response matrices M_i=e_i e_i^T on two source and two dirty helper coordinates, with e_i=(1,0),(0,1),(1,1),(1,-1).
Modulo three, the four kernels cover every reader row. For some cut, a M_i b lies in 3D for every b, so it cannot be a unit. Explicit dyadic witnesses attain every proper subfamily. A listed 14-ADD scalar word visits all four responses and restores every incoming coordinate. Over Q the common reader (1,2) works, with one source column using a denominator three.
This supplies a deletion-minimal temporal compatibility counterexample. Four is not claimed to be the smallest possible obstruction among all matrices. A fixed invertible helper basis and cut-dependent unit rescaling do not escape it; changing readers or the coefficient ring changes the contract.
The contribution was produced by Nick Petalas. Credit Ali Romman's PR5615 single-cut unit-pairing background, PR5602/5611/5599, PR5115 and their retained helper/native/controller/compiler lineage. Projective-line covering and reduction modulo a prime are classical. No predecessor numerical result or verifier was audited or replayed.
Advance CLAIM. Base canonical main
a5bff3bf133e482541c09eba4e773884bdb2b1b7, priority revision 8. The source-binding baseline passes and resolves selected conditional kappa .003125804. Live overlap, merged/main searches and reservations were refreshed before committing; the documented coverage does not include unpublished work.Evidence
8fee704ce85d346aaac08e3d217373d7011a8b13.Exact reproduction from the repository root:
Another CPython 3.12 interpreter path may replace the absolute local path. Only the standard library is used. Expected markers include
PASS_COMMON_READER_CUT_OBSTRUCTION,PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGEandPASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES.Limitations and unrun obligations
The contract concerns the coefficient response h_i=h_in+M_i x under one fixed physical reader. Its observation still contains arbitrary incoming dirt. The source-response matrices are not asserted to be the full eligible prefix/suffix pairing matrices of an actual P104 helper split. The reversible scalar trajectory alone supplies no free dirty read or productive target.
Actual selected-word installation, native charts/maps, owned delivery, dirt cancellation, physical reader-rebasing tariffs, precision/growth, storage, compiler and the complete paid/target invoice remain unproved. No source-bound supplier replay, selected scientific replay, Lean, Docker, supplier admission or complete multiplication theorem was run or claimed. The selected frontier and its five framework assumptions remain unchanged. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed.
Open next questions
Related open work
Completion refresh found no open account PR created since the advance CLAIM. No inspected open PR studies these four source-response matrices or this fixed-reader feasibility question. No additional predecessor computations were run.
Previously listed adjacent PRs #6222 and #6214 are now merged. PR6222 concerns joint parallel banks at one common cut with arbitrary joint row/column choices; this result fixes one row across several chronological source responses, so neither computes the other's quantity. PR6214 audits the PR6144/6167 P104 words and their bills; this result neither replays those words nor computes their kappas.
CI notes
Both hosted checks passed at exact head
8fee704ce85d346aaac08e3d217373d7011a8b13in run 40965015940:planandreplay (research/common-reader-cut-obstruction). The completed checks were read once and both report pass. The PR has since been merged by a maintainer.Hosted replay certifies the registered normal and optimized finite checks at this head. The local metadata/source pins, committed-byte/mode/source-history checks and read-only Git-free export checks listed above also passed. No CI failure remains to report. These checks do not supply independent human or formal proof-kernel acceptance, physical supplier admission or a new kappa.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way.
Blast radius: package. Five new files and opt-in replay only. Shared code, pinned predecessors and the selected record are unchanged.