Add BABY COIN (BABY) metadata on BNB Smart Chain

[mohsenorak-dotcom]

Adds metadata and logo for BABY COIN (BABY) on BNB Smart Chain.

Official Website:
https://www.babycoin1.com/

Network: BNB Smart Chain
Chain ID: 56

Contract Address:
0x0e5f7CF1641d029Cfb0c11bc1f485d33d26104B0

Symbol: BABY
Decimals: 18

Official project repository:
https://github.com/mohsenorak-dotcom/baby-coin-assets

This pull request adds:

• BABY COIN token metadata
• BABY COIN logo

---

Note

Low Risk
Metadata-only addition with no application or security logic changes.

Overview
Registers BABY COIN (BABY, 18 decimals) for BNB Smart Chain (chain ID 56) at contract 0x0e5f7CF1641d029Cfb0c11bc1f485d33d26104B0.

Adds a new ERC20 metadata file under metadata/eip155:56/, including name, symbol, decimals, erc20: true, and a relative path to the token logo PNG.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c88a027. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[mohsenorak-dotcom]

Hello MetaMask team,

I would kindly appreciate it if you could review and approve this pull request for the BABY COIN token metadata and logo. Please let me know if any changes or additional information are required.

Thank you very much for your time and support.

[mohsenorak-dotcom]

Hello MetaMask team,

I hope you’re doing well.

I’m following up regarding this pull request for BABY COIN metadata and logo. I noticed that the automated checks are currently showing action_required, and I would appreciate it if you could confirm whether any action, approval, or additional information is required from my side before the checks can proceed.

If there are any issues with the metadata structure, logo format, contract information, or submission requirements, please let me know and I will be happy to make the necessary changes.

Thank you for your time and for reviewing the submission.

[mohsenorak-dotcom]

Hello MetaMask team,

I hope you’re doing well. I’m following up regarding PR #1935 for BABY COIN (BABY) metadata on BNB Smart Chain.

I noticed that the “Test” and “MetaMask Security Code Scanner” workflows are showing an action_required conclusion, although the pull request appears to be mergeable. Could you please let me know whether any action, approval, or correction is required from my side?

If there is any issue with the metadata, logo format, contract information, or submission requirements, I would be grateful if you could let me know so I can address it promptly.

Thank you for your time and for reviewing my submission.