You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I agree. That is a great idea. The set of 2D Ellipsoids with/or without boundaries will give us a fast tool for ring dynamics calculations. Parallelization scheme should be more flexible and faster then FFT based algorithms.
Implemented in PR #143, mostly by AI. Looks like it's giving correct results, comparing to 2D PIC with KV distribution (1 ellipse) or Gaussian distribution (5-10 ellipses) for long coasting bunches.
No boundaries conditions were implemented.
Have not tested with MPI.
Do we want to weight transverse kicks by longitudinal density, like in SC2p5D?
Similarly, do we want to add a node under SCSliceBySlice2D? This would run a separate ellipse solver in each longitudinal slice.
I renamed classes to follow same convention as other space charge nodes.
Activity
shishlo commentedon Apr 15, 2025
I agree. That is a great idea. The set of 2D Ellipsoids with/or without boundaries will give us a fast tool for ring dynamics calculations. Parallelization scheme should be more flexible and faster then FFT based algorithms.
austin-hoover commentedon Sep 5, 2026
Implemented in PR #143, mostly by AI. Looks like it's giving correct results, comparing to 2D PIC with KV distribution (1 ellipse) or Gaussian distribution (5-10 ellipses) for long coasting bunches.