You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Choose the project license for the public launch #8
Which open-source license should OpenBeat use for its source and public release, given the maintainer's reuse goals, the open-source ethos of the project, source provenance, and bundled dependency obligations?
Resolution should record
Whether the project should be permissive or copyleft.
The selected SPDX license and the reason it fits.
Any provenance concern or third-party obligation the implementation must preserve.
The exact public claims the selected license permits.
This is a HITL decision: use $grilling and $domain-modeling, and let the maintainer speak for the project's values.
OpenBeat will be released under the MIT License (MIT).
License posture: Permissive. People may use, copy, modify, distribute, sublicense, and sell OpenBeat, including in closed-source or commercial products, provided they preserve the MIT copyright and permission notice.
Why it fits: The maintainer prioritizes straightforward community adoption and broad reuse over requiring downstream modifications to remain open. MIT expresses that intent with a small, familiar set of obligations and an explicit warranty/liability disclaimer.
Source provenance: The maintainer confirms that the OpenBeat source was created by Parker Eimerl (including work produced through Parker's coding tools) and was not copied or adapted from another person or project. Historical SwiftHustle and eimexdev author identities belong to the maintainer; T3 Code identifies a coding tool, not a separate human rights-holder.
Third-party obligations: MIT covers OpenBeat's own source only. The bundled Python runtime and dependencies retain their respective licenses, copyright notices, and any required attribution/notice files. The release implementation must inventory and preserve those materials; it must not imply that all bundled code is MIT-licensed.
Permitted public claims: OpenBeat may be described as “open source,” “MIT-licensed,” “free to use, modify, and redistribute,” and usable in commercial or closed-source projects subject to the MIT notice requirement. It should not be described as public domain, obligation-free, warranty-backed, officially affiliated with DaVinci Resolve/Blackmagic Design, or wholly MIT-licensed when referring to the complete installer bundle.
Activity
[-]Choose and add a project license before public launch[/-][+]Choose the project license for the public launch[/+]eimexdev commentedon Jul 25, 2026
Resolution
OpenBeat will be released under the MIT License (
MIT).Copyright © 2026 Parker EimerlSwiftHustleandeimexdevauthor identities belong to the maintainer;T3 Codeidentifies a coding tool, not a separate human rights-holder.Implementation is handed off to Apply the selected project license and align public metadata.