chore: name @Beetix code owner for Linux/Wayland capture

[EtienneLescot]

@Beetix has taken the Linux/Wayland capture side. This names him code owner on the paths he already wrote, so reviews there get routed to him automatically.

Paths: pipewire-capture, the Linux capture session and PipeWire cursor recording bridges, and the *_linux.rs compositor sources.

Both of us are listed on each path so neither is blocked on the other. The main-protection ruleset already requires code-owner review, so this takes effect as soon as it lands — and it means Linux PRs no longer need a maintainer bypass to merge, since there is finally a second code owner who can approve them.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: d1491af5-892a-4fde-8f48-031ca4311927

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d355e7 and d4a5522.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/CODEOWNERS

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The CODEOWNERS file adds five rules for Linux and Wayland capture-related paths. The rules assign Beetix and EtienneLescot as owners.

Changes

Linux capture ownership

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Capture path ownership rules .github/CODEOWNERS	Adds owners for the PipeWire capture module, Linux native capture session, PipeWire cursor recording, and compositor Linux Rust files.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to d4a55

This adds Linux and Wayland capture code ownership coverage without changing runtime behavior. No current merge-blocking risk is identified.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description explains the CODEOWNERS change and its review impact, but it does not follow the required template. It omits the Summary, Related issue, Type of change, Release impact, Desktop impact,…	Rewrite the description using the repository template. Add all required headings, select the applicable change, release, and desktop impact options, state the related issue or indicate that none applies, and describe testing or validation p…

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the main change: assigning @Beetix as a code owner for Linux/Wayland capture paths.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description explains the CODEOWNERS change and its review impact, but it does not follow the required template. It omits the Summary, Related issue, Type of change, Release impact, Desktop impact, Screenshots / video, and Testing sections.

Resolution

Rewrite the description using the repository template. Add all required headings, select the applicable change, release, and desktop impact options, state the related issue or indicate that none applies, and describe testing or validation performed.

• Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codeowners-linux

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}