Skip to content

feat(mctl-support): revert pilot model to Nebius GLM-5.1 via AI Gateway - #2274

Merged
mashkovd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/2262-revert-nebius
Oct 29, 2026
Merged

mashkovd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/2262-revert-nebius

Conversation

@mashkovd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Verification step 4 of the AI Gateway spike (#2262): back to the pilot's reference model after steps 2 (#2272, Qwen3.8-27B) and 3 (#2273, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B) each answered 3 tickets on karabu with the ledger priced at the fair prices.

Test plan

  • Pods restart with MODEL_PROVIDER=nebius, no HETZNER_MODEL
  • A ticket on karabu answered; ledger record shows provider=nebius, pricing 1.40/4.40

Refs #2262

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01N6GXDkZrcD6t2fxiG6fVWZ

Verification step 4 of the AI Gateway spike (#2262): the Hetzner models
answered every ticket and the ledger priced them at the fair prices, so the
pilot goes back to its reference GLM-5.1 on Nebius through the gateway.
HETZNER_API_KEY stays in the model secret so the Hetzner fallback remains a
values-only switch.

Refs #2262

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N6GXDkZrcD6t2fxiG6fVWZ
@claude

claude Bot commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Claude finished @mashkovd's task in 8s —— View job


I'll analyze this and get back to you.

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Values-only revert of mctl-support model env to Nebius GLM-5.1 and prior prices; no logic change.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Antigravity (agy) review — informational

Model: gemini-3.8-flash-high · commit ecde549.

No significant issues found.

@mashkovd
mashkovd merged commit d764c4c into main Oct 29, 2026
25 checks passed
@mashkovd
mashkovd deleted the feat/2262-revert-nebius branch October 29, 2026 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant