dm-faq: fix table_parttern_ typo to table_pattern_ - #23772
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe FAQ example for ChangesFAQ correction
Priority: ⬇️ Low — Impact reflects low issue severity. Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Severity of issue fixed: Low Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change corrects the table-name spelling in a DM FAQ example and is ready to merge without identified production risk. Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
What is changed, added, or deleted? (Required)
Fixes a typo in the example table name:
table_parttern_should betable_pattern_, consistent with the rest of the sentence which already usestable_pattern_6.Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
AI agent involvement
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?
Summary by CodeRabbit
table-routewildcard matching.