Skip to content

Port the marker placement unit test from sillsdev/machine#496 - #367

Merged
pmachapman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
port_marker_placement_test
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

pmachapman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
port_marker_placement_test

Conversation

@pmachapman

@pmachapman pmachapman commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fixes #362

Port of the unit test from sillsdev/machine#496 to confirm the bug in C# machine is not present in Python.


This change is Reviewable

@pmachapman
pmachapman requested a review from Enkidu93 September 14, 2026 01:27
@pmachapman
pmachapman force-pushed the port_marker_placement_test branch 2 times, most recently from 0054086 to 8181d56 Compare September 14, 2026 01:44
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.13%. Comparing base (29088f8) to head (ed49a45).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #367   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.12%   92.13%           
=======================================
  Files         390      390           
  Lines       24635    24644    +9     
=======================================
+ Hits        22695    22705   +10     
+ Misses       1940     1939    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ddaspit ddaspit left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

@ddaspit reviewed 1 file and all commit messages, and made 1 comment.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on Enkidu93).

@Enkidu93 Enkidu93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

@Enkidu93 reviewed all commit messages and made 1 comment.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on pmachapman).

@pmachapman
pmachapman force-pushed the port_marker_placement_test branch from 8181d56 to ed49a45 Compare September 15, 2026 00:55
@pmachapman
pmachapman merged commit e2af2c8 into main Sep 15, 2026
17 of 18 checks passed
@pmachapman
pmachapman deleted the port_marker_placement_test branch September 15, 2026 01:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Port 'Use StringComparison.Ordinal when locating token indices in PlaceMarkersUsfmUpdateBlockHandler'

4 participants