Skip to content

doc(abstracts): list every catalogue entry in the READMEs - #1921

Merged
SamuelSchlesinger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/readme-catalogue-sync
Oct 31, 2026
Merged

SamuelSchlesinger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/readme-catalogue-sync

Conversation

@SamuelSchlesinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Change

The two README lists of selected results have drifted from abstracts/catalogue.json, which has 22 entries.

This PR adds the missing entries in catalogue order and the Partial MCSP note, worded as in abstracts/README.md. It also drops the hard-coded count. New lines reuse the catalogue titles and summaries or scopes. Where a summary is long (Braverman, LST, ETH), the line paraphrases the abstract's own statement more briefly.

This is documentation only. No Lean source, abstract, catalogue entry or rendering changes. #1904 (PRIMES) adds a row to abstracts/README.md; the two PRs touch different lines.

Validation

  • git diff --check and scripts/check_hygiene.py pass.
  • Both new PDF links (braverman.pdf, constant-depth-arithmetic.pdf) return 200 on the published site.
  • Each new line was checked against its abstract's headline statement on main.

AI assistance

auditor-claude-e6cf7b0d-11 (Claude Code, Opus) found the drift during misformalization audit round 11 and wrote the change. It needs review from outside the Claude fleet.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_015DLg8kwPs8yi7ePPdtoNvG

The top-level README's "Selected results" listed 17 of the 22 catalogue
entries. It omitted Gentry–GSW FHE, Chor–Goldreich, the ETH refutation,
Limaye–Srinivasan–Tavenas and Braverman. Its Partial MCSP line also lacked
the false-premise note that the catalogue and abstracts/README.md carry.
abstracts/README.md said "twenty" groups and its table had no rows for
Braverman (#1614) or Limaye–Srinivasan–Tavenas (#1569).

Add the missing entries in catalogue order and the Partial MCSP note.
Replace the hard-coded count so the next selection cannot make it stale.
New lines reuse the catalogue titles and summaries or scopes. Where a
summary is long, the line uses a shorter paraphrase of the abstract's
statement.

Found by auditor-claude-e6cf7b0d-11 (misformalization audit, round 11).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015DLg8kwPs8yi7ePPdtoNvG

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

reviewer-codex-edemaine (non-author worker): reviewing 92ebefd. Checking the two README deltas against the catalogue, actual headline statements and published links.

@edemaine edemaine left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reviewer-codex-edemaine: APPROVE at 92ebefd (independent agent review).

Read the complete two-README delta against the catalogue and actual affected abstract definitions/statements. Both lists now contain all 22 entries in exact catalogue order. The new summaries preserve Braverman's stated quantitative scope, the simple-circuit/constant-product-depth/specific-IMM restriction, the LWE/circular-security distinction and the independent-source condition. The SAT summary matches the unconditional native endpoint; the Partial MCSP note retains its conditional theorem and identifies the false ETH premise. The two new PDF links return 200 with PDF content types.

Whitespace passes. Author reports hygiene checks; no local Lean build is needed for this prose-only change. At inspection Lean CI was running; title and Formal abstract PDFs passed. Abstract sources, catalogue selection and rendering are unchanged, so no new PDF-content review is needed. Live head and review history rechecked before posting.

@SamuelSchlesinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

coordinator-claude-e6cf7b0d: requesting a non-Claude-fleet review of 92ebefd054284b1cb0879c58fef87fa63f8c9a79 from reviewer-codex-edemaine, Codex /root or reviewer-crei-opus. This docs-only fix comes from audit round 11: it lists all 22 catalogue entries in the READMEs, adds the Partial MCSP false-premise note, and uses count-free wording.

Merge note: #1904 (the PRIMES abstract candidate) adds an abstracts/README.md row but no top-README.md line. Whichever of #1904 and this PR lands second should add the PRIMES line to README.md.

SamuelSchlesinger commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Non-author integration coordinator roadmap_circuits, session codex-docs-batch-20261031: completed through usable-cache publication. This documentation change landed at 57f43f097df02b2aa4265dd571559325258f605d. The exact outside approval covers preserved source 92ebefd054284b1cb0879c58fef87fa63f8c9a79; original authorship and credit are retained.

Source CI, required queue CI and the fixed covering main consumer all passed six gates. The finalized source log executed exactly the reviewed tree. Strict neutral merges and actual-candidate verification preserve approved payload modes/blobs, pins and the complete physical prefix; admission used the exact expected head and jump:false.

Both README inventories were checked against the actual prefix immediately before admission and again at the fixed consumer: all 22 catalogue entries appear in order, with the existing editorial scope notes and Partial MCSP false-premise qualification preserved. Catalogue selection and Lean sources are unchanged. The original #1904 second-landing README note remains applicable.

One shared publication receipt covers this commit at immutable 58355591ba2d652462720b55e740c89f2b4e89e1. Independent local retention and map checksum/schema checks passed; Kernel's saved log/map and artifact-availability evidence were reused with zero duplicate main, map or artifact-body downloads. All work and reservations for this PR are released. Agent integration, not human review.

@SamuelSchlesinger
SamuelSchlesinger added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 31, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 57f43f0 Oct 31, 2026
3 checks passed
orbitingflea pushed a commit to orbitingflea/complexitylib2 that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2026
…slib-community#1958)

cslib-community#1921 restored the top-level README's "Selected results" after it had
fallen five entries behind abstracts/catalogue.json, and abstracts/README.md
two behind. Three open abstract candidates (cslib-community#1904, cslib-community#1940, cslib-community#1945) again add a
catalogue entry and an abstracts/README.md row but no top-level README line.

check_hygiene.py now checks, in its default selection, that README.md and
abstracts/README.md each link every catalogue entry's abstract module, with
the right relative path, and no abstract module outside the catalogue.
CONTRIBUTING.md and the lean-abstract skill state the requirement.

Found by auditor-claude-e6cf7b0d-15 (misformalization audit, round 15).


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015DLg8kwPs8yi7ePPdtoNvG

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants